|
|
Post by The Wirefox on Jan 14, 2012 20:42:58 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Correia on Jan 14, 2012 23:15:15 GMT
If I not not sympathize with the first one I do like the second very much.  What I like most is the "confusion" of the supposed to be leaves and the frames. However, the violet at the botom...  leaves me un decided. |
|
|
|
Post by rasbury on Jan 15, 2012 0:56:00 GMT
I'm more in favor of the first one Steve.A very simple but intriguing image.The second one looks to busy for me,but a very good image on it's own.
|
|
janis
Working With A Pro
[Mo0:0]
Posts: 898
|
Post by janis on Jan 15, 2012 1:53:25 GMT
I very much like the concept of #1, Steve. I was going to ask whether it wasn't too subtly expressed, but then I remembered your name is Wire fox. And, it may be that it is not subtle at all, just that I am thickheaded.  |
|
|
|
Post by Barry on Jan 15, 2012 10:00:28 GMT
I think I prefer your colour version of image 1 which you posted in another thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Wirefox on Jan 15, 2012 13:36:06 GMT
Antonio, I was on two minds about whether the second image should not be monochrome. I will certainly return to this one. Ron, I too prefer the simplicity. I am trying to get back to working with very simple images. Janis, The message is subtle even though the forms are basic...how one skewed entity can bring confusion the normal order of things. I like the idea that slightly out of position component can bring confusion and superimpose its obtusiveness on the mundanity of order. Barry, I have to admit that the coloured version was an after thought. Although the colour detracts from the message I think it is far more palatable to the eye. |
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Jan 15, 2012 13:40:18 GMT
The last one has a very trompe l'oeil feel to it -as most of them do, this one just moreso. If you haven't already, you might want to explore this art form and see how you can incorporate it into your imagery. It certainly has potential to take trompe l'oeil into a different dimension.
|
|
|
|
Post by cannockwolf on Jan 18, 2012 19:27:28 GMT
first for me i like the simple design, it appeals to the graphic designer in me, I wouldnt be any good at this sort of thing wouldnt know where to start
|
|
|
|
Post by Barry on Jan 18, 2012 19:36:15 GMT
I wouldnt be any good at this sort of thing wouldnt know where to start You would be adding a sky to it ;D |
|
|
|
Post by katynoelle on Jan 18, 2012 19:46:12 GMT
Janis, The message is subtle even though the forms are basic...how one skewed entity can bring confusion the normal order of things. I like the idea that slightly out of position component can bring confusion and superimpose its obtusiveness on the mundanity of order. Yup, Janis has got it right! Your name is 'Wirefox', alright!  One slightly skewed component, does, definitely make it much more interesting. I liked the colored version, that's somewhere around here, better. but, I still don't know what to say about the decay part. Perhaps, the others are right about the colors - the purple on the bottom is too much??? Not sure about that, though. but, maybe, with so many aspects of it, it's trying too hard because the whole concept of mixing these elements - cold and hard vs. botanic and brittle - seems really good! edit: although....I have to say...I love your mix of colors in that one! |
|
|
|
Post by cannockwolf on Jan 18, 2012 19:53:29 GMT
You would be adding a sky to it ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by The Wirefox on Jan 19, 2012 6:55:20 GMT
I wouldnt be any good at this sort of thing wouldnt know where to start You would be adding a sky to it ;D Now there's a thought |
|
