|
Post by robnaylor on Oct 2, 2011 9:50:26 GMT
My mum always told me never to put boots on the table! This is a heavy HDR of a local Market trader.
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Oct 2, 2011 18:43:42 GMT
In a treatment such as this, I wonder why you don't just add some significant noise or a texture overlay to the image and call it a day...IMO, it seems like a lot of work with little return. I would love this as a B&W or even a normal color image, but, and this is probably more my own personal dislike for HDR, HDR just doesn't do it for me...and isn't it good we don't all march to the beat of the same drummer...
|
|
|
Post by robnaylor on Oct 2, 2011 18:50:44 GMT
Well said Chris!
|
|
|
Post by Kit on Oct 3, 2011 1:17:22 GMT
I don't mind HDR, but this is a little overcooked to my taste. The biggest problem with HDR for me, apart from the very overdone (which this isn't) is the almost inevitable noise that appears. Not sure how that can be controlled, though. But the subject is interesting, even if he does have his boots on the table.
|
|
|
Post by robnaylor on Oct 3, 2011 9:00:35 GMT
Thanks Kit, This one is very "well-done" on the cooking meter. I pushed all the sliders beyond the norm to see what would happen (I have done it before on a couple of occasions) sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't - this time it didn't These are my previous attempts ( I think these work for well-cooked HDR, there is something a bit "pop-arty" about them that I like )...
|
|
|
Post by Kit on Oct 4, 2011 7:57:29 GMT
Rob, I can see that these HDR's must be generated with a single image - either that or you have one helluva fast camera - so do you generate additional images for HDR or simply use one in the software?
|
|
|
Post by DonS on Oct 4, 2011 8:36:34 GMT
I think I have to agree with Kit that this HDR generated from a single image.. Because if you do it from (at least) 3 images, it won't be so much noise on the result..
|
|
|
Post by robnaylor on Oct 4, 2011 14:08:07 GMT
This is three exposures from one original RAW (-2/0/+2). As for the noise, sometimes it works - see the earlier two I did, but this time I think I was too close and didn't "cook it enough" I have never yet done this sort of extreme HDR on landscapes or buildings - just on a few people shots , for something different. You can't say it's not different... ;D
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Oct 4, 2011 22:00:06 GMT
Oh, I can, I can...but I won't.
|
|
|
Post by robnaylor on Oct 4, 2011 22:13:50 GMT
Oh, I can, I can...but I won't. What? Not different...? If I didn't know better, I would think you might be trying to wind me up just a little ? ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by DonS on Oct 5, 2011 6:55:02 GMT
This is three exposures from one original RAW (-2/0/+2). Oh I see, so you are using bracketing mode on the camera?? Once I try to combine 2 raw files. The first picture I shot with multiple exposure. And the second picture I shot with multiple f-stop. What do you think?? Maybe because it was a night shot so you won't see much the noise... ;D
|
|
|
Post by robnaylor on Oct 5, 2011 10:37:25 GMT
This is three exposures from one original RAW (-2/0/+2). Oh I see, so you are using bracketing mode on the camera?? Sorry Don you misunderstand. It is a single exposure, shot as a RAW file, then in the RAW>JPG converter I have saved three copies of the image at three adjustments of the exposure setting (-2/0/+2) then put these through Photomatix and whacked up the sliders. So, it's not a true HDR, but a pseudo HDR (hence all the noise ), but, it was the noise I was after, along with the very heavy tonemapping, to get this "over cooked" effect. Nice night HDR shot BTW !
|
|
|
Post by katynoelle on Oct 5, 2011 11:35:10 GMT
Hi, Rob! You know, I do like the image - it has a load of atmosphere. When I saw what you'd done with it, I, also, wondered about adding a texture, instead. I mean, I was just wondering - I don't know - the way you treated it made me want it to try on another outfit. Do you ever do anything with textures? Just wiffley thoughts...
|
|