|
Post by Antonio Correia on Jan 11, 2012 20:12:01 GMT
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Jan 11, 2012 20:14:19 GMT
You're good to about 2/3 up...then it goes from "ugh" to real "ugh."
|
|
|
Post by The Wirefox on Jan 11, 2012 20:34:07 GMT
Too many mid tones Antonio. I think there has to be intrinsic dynamic range and form contrasts within the original scene for b/w to work really well. The scene and composition are good and I like the lead in with the path.
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Correia on Jan 11, 2012 21:07:55 GMT
Thank you Not all photograph are successful
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Jan 11, 2012 21:14:17 GMT
Oh, I have boxes of not so greats...don't we all.
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Correia on Jan 11, 2012 21:16:21 GMT
Oh, I have boxes of not so greats...don't we all. Sure But it is good - I think - to post something poor from time to time. We can have a better perception of our limitations...
|
|
|
Post by Barry on Jan 11, 2012 21:31:06 GMT
I think some detail in the sky would had helped. But I do like the winding path taking your eye into the image..
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Correia on Jan 11, 2012 21:40:12 GMT
I am busy now but I have to try again.
|
|
|
Post by cannockwolf on Jan 18, 2012 14:00:16 GMT
cut the top off and paint some more mist in the far path and trees but using a cloud layer with a mask and paint it in gently, should make it look misty
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Correia on Jan 18, 2012 15:44:20 GMT
cut the top off and paint some more mist in the far path and trees but using a cloud layer with a mask and paint it in gently, should make it look misty Thank you Dave I will do it when I can because I am far from my main machine I even want to start from scratch ! However, I am not particularly attracted by the photograph but I will try anyway
|
|
|
Post by cannockwolf on Jan 18, 2012 17:18:50 GMT
i know what you mean, if that tree was 4 times bigger and on the other side of the path it would be a lot stronger, ive wasted many hours trying to make a picture work that just isnt good enough, sometimes its better to just say no
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Correia on Jan 18, 2012 22:05:45 GMT
i know what you mean, if that tree was 4 times bigger and on the other side of the path it would be a lot stronger, ive wasted many hours trying to make a picture work that just isnt good enough, sometimes its better to just say no Indeed not all our photographs are good. And we are more and more demanding... In my small photography group here we have someone who works with a small machine and he is happy with it in spite of being able to afford something better. I couldn't do it ! I moved to a larger screen because I was hungry of more quality (and could afford it!)
|
|