|
|
Post by Stevewebb on Jul 28, 2013 10:44:27 GMT
We are visiting friends in Wales this weekend and I remembered Rob Marshall doing some pictures at this place. More to come but these are trying to get a different perspective with the fish eye.    |
|
|
|
Post by jeeperman on Jul 28, 2013 16:20:12 GMT
Ooh, me likes #2.
|
|
janis
Working With A Pro
[Mo0:0]
Posts: 898
|
Post by janis on Jul 28, 2013 16:21:04 GMT
+1.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stevewebb on Jul 28, 2013 23:32:22 GMT
Thanks Paul and Janis. Number 2 is my favourite too. In fact I think it has won a place on the wall of Webb Towers  |
|
|
|
Post by cannockwolf on Sept 17, 2013 19:43:37 GMT
#2 has a brill composition and view point but can you bring any of that sky back? it would help a lot tbh as it looks blown out or near too it, if you can bring some sky back your eye would fix on the waterfall first then and make it stronger
|
|
|
|
Post by Stevewebb on Sept 17, 2013 21:50:06 GMT
#2 has a brill composition and view point but can you bring any of that sky back? it would help a lot tbh as it looks blown out or near too it, if you can bring some sky back your eye would fix on the waterfall first then and make it stronger You are right, but there was no sky :-(. It was a bright but overcast day, no features in the sky at all, just solid white. Maybe I will try and slot a new one in at some point. |
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Sept 18, 2013 0:48:40 GMT
If you can get David to do a tutorial on dropping in different skies...  ? hint hint hint.  and of course, we know you are a busy man. |
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Sept 18, 2013 1:25:48 GMT
I think I am on the right track by making a color selection (in this case almost pure white), saving the selection, opening a cloud file and put it under the background (falls), then loading the falls selection and adding a mask to the BG layer and brush in the background. This doesn't work great on this image because of the brightness of the sky and equal brightness of the water but, David, am I on the right track?  |
|
|
|
Post by Stevewebb on Sept 18, 2013 6:26:51 GMT
Number 3 is a tough gig Chris. Number 2 is much more feasible to put a new sky on as the sky is separated from the water.
I will have a go at it and use it as a tute if if works.
|
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Sept 18, 2013 12:03:36 GMT
The only reason I didn't do #2 is because it's a bit heavy on the orton effect and I no longer have that action. The clouds would have to have some of that effect to make a natural blend to the shot.
|
|
|
|
Post by georgem on Sept 29, 2013 16:15:35 GMT
Number 2!
|
|
