|
|
Post by chrisc on Nov 17, 2013 13:53:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Nov 17, 2013 13:54:20 GMT
Can only insert one shot at a time...something's amiss with Flickr...again!  |
|
|
|
Post by mariehass on Nov 18, 2013 1:00:28 GMT
These are impressive, Chris. I would almost prefer loosing the bottom 1/4 of both, but that is my own style. Would you mind sharing your settings?
'Rie
|
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Nov 18, 2013 1:19:59 GMT
The dock was 3, 5, 7 and 20 seconds (4 exposures to get the light on the dock), f/6.3 ISO 400
The restaurant was 1.3, 3, 5 sec @ f/6.3 ISO 400
I like the bottom as it helps ease the eye into the shot.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stevewebb on Nov 18, 2013 6:53:28 GMT
Very nice Chris. So now you have your new camera, suddenly you are not happy with a 75mb raw image, you have to mix 4 of them together  |
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Nov 18, 2013 12:29:08 GMT
Very nice Chris. So now you have your new camera, suddenly you are not happy with a 75mb raw image, you have to mix 4 of them together By the time I'm through a decent edit, I often have files in the 215MB range. It doth tax the processor a bit. I am experimenting with bright sunlight extended exposure shots which consist of 12 stacked images. Now you're talking about a file.  |
|
|
|
Post by nickjohnson on Nov 18, 2013 19:49:17 GMT
Nice Chris - I especially like #1. I suspect that the areas that look a little darkish on the web version will actually print up absolutely fab.  |
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Nov 18, 2013 20:28:42 GMT
Lot more detail there than shows online. I sold 6 prints at a charity auction last weekend and even after the 40% donation, I made a fair chunk of change.
|
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Nov 18, 2013 20:30:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by chrisc on Nov 18, 2013 20:31:23 GMT
I've since cropped it top an bottom by about a 1/4 each
|
|
